|Seriously, what the diff....? I have a campaign to run.|
First, we have last month's Hillary Clinton hearing before Congress where Democrats showered her with bon mots and Republicans were too busy making speeches that they never gave her the opportunity during those five-minute segments to let her hang herself on her own words - the very words we know lead to mistruths because she did nothing but purvey innacuracies about the incident since last September.
Hillary inexplicably proclaimed that she never saw cables from the late-Ambassador asking for more security prior to September 11. This is the Secretary of State (!) who is getting verbal kisses from Democrats for what a great job she did but she didn't know about "her dear friend" Ambassador Stevens impassioned pleas for help? Or did she just not act?
Hillary claimed she had a "clear-eyed view" of the problems in the Middle East but she didn't review despairing cables from her dear friend? When she did have time to answer questions (instead of time filled up by blustery, long-winded questions from Congressmen) she filled her bloviated answers with procedural nonsense and listing of long-worded-named agencies. And when she did become flustered upon the minimal direct questioning about her non-involvement in a 'state' activity she threw up her hands and exclaimed "At this point what's difference does it make!?" Her testimony was dispicable and certainly untruthful.
Three weeks later, outgoing CIA Chief Leon Panetta said he did not talk to President Obama after his 5 PM meeting the day the Benghazi attacks occured. He also said he did not talk to Hillary. He claimed the State Department did not ask him to act. Meanwhile the attacks went on for another 9 hours. What were they doing? No, what the f--- were they doing?!!!
|Nothing to see here...it's all good.|
|"...like peas and carrots..."|